|
"Joining-Up" Marcomm Measurement
Planning and measuring PR in the context of other marketing communication
Anna Salter
Why does PR need to be measurable
against other
media?
Many top companies now use a channel-neutral approach
to marketing. This means that they do not automatically
put all their marketing communications budget to advertising,
but rather have realized that some messages are more convincingly
communicated through other avenues, be that PR, product placement,
sponsorship or point-of-sale. They also appreciate that these other
media can be more cost effective in reaching their key audience, in
particular niche categories, such as special interest or expert groups,
or people within a narrow age band. At the same time, advertisers
are looking for ways to trim costs and are smartening up
their buying practices to avoid waste. Not even the
most mass-marketed brands are taking a “spray
and pray” approach to media buying.
This strategy in planning marketing communications campaigns
requires a “joined up” approach to measurement. If the correct tools are used to evaluate these mixed-media campaigns, the information is available to effectively evaluate the success of initiatives and plan more efficient and successful campaigns next time around.
What tools can we use to plan and evaluate
PR in a “joined up” way?
There remains some skepticism within
certain client organizations that there is a concrete
way of evaluating the “efficiency” and “effectiveness” of
PR and media relations activity. There are and will
always be reasons why this is so, given the fact that
PR professionals cannot control what a journalist
will write, they can merely influence it. There is,
however, a solution to this issue of establishing the
value of the PR function.
Tools that already exist in the advertising planning
world can be applied to evaluate return on investment in a mixed-media
campaign.
How do the ad guys do it?
Advertising media planners attempt to buy exposure to
their key target audiences for the best possible price. This involves
an approach that considers the most cost-effective
number of spots, slotted for optimal timing and placement. They avoid
spending money on buying audience outside their target.
In the example below, you can see how media buyers might
select the publications and programs that best fit their target. The
media have been mapped in terms of their affinity toward
different attitudes, age or interest groups.
[ Click to Enlarge ]
How does this relate to planning a PR campaign?
There
is an obvious parallel here with choosing the media
to target for a PR campaign. A PR agency will select the best titles,
based on those that are most read by the target group. They will
use several research resources to rank media according to age,
sex, income/class or other demographic categories. Most major titles
and programs are audited according to these criteria.
Therefore, if you wish to hit a wealthy primary shopper between
the ages of 25 and 44 living in California, you have all the information
you need. Organizations are increasingly finding, though, that
they cannot place their customers within these boxes any more.
People make their buying decisions because of what they need or
desire, not because of their age or income.
The age/sex/income criteria have a weakness
in that they do not take into account the different needs, preferences
and attitudes across these broad groups. For example, the buyers
of Harley Davidson motorcycles cannot be typified by these classifications.
The people who buy Harleys might be Hell’s Angels, men seeking adventure,
or “chicks on bikes.” These groups do not have age, sex
or income in common. What they do have in common is a
desire for liberty. The question is how do you reach these people
through the media without using a very broad PR campaign, attempting
to gain coverage in any and all media, on the off chance that one
of the key customers might see it? You need to understand their lifestyle,
needs and preferences.
How do we find out which media are important
to our customers?
The Target Group Index (TGI)
study, undertaken in 51 countries, which is conducted
by Millward Brown, can deliver data against very specific and diverse
audiences, based on psychographic or interest/activity factors, rather
than merely the traditional demographics of age, income, etc. This
study also includes the readership and TV watching habits of these
groups, so people with very specific needs and desires can be mapped
to the media they consume.
Through the TGI database, the media habits of people are mapped
according to their lifestyle or attitude, not their perceived position
in society. Examples of the ways in which groups can be categorized
include:
- People who tend to consult a financial advisor before
making a major financial decision
- People who believe that a woman’s place
is in the home
- People who spend more than $40 per month on skin
and hair care
- People who fly for personal or leisure purposes
over three times each year
Indeed, you could use TGI to define the media
habits of the people who meet some or all of these profiles. Clearly
then, we can use these definitions in order to aid a client’s
segmentation strategy.
The output is a list of the media that will
be most effective in “hitting” the
target audience. The PR team can therefore concentrate
on achieving coverage in these titles with the knowledge that they
will be using their time and budget effectively.
In this example, we have ranked some of the
key U.K. media to deliver an audience who “usually consults
a financial advisor before making a financial decision.” This
could be used for a client who only markets its products through
financial third parties.
| Publication |
% audience reached |
|
| Daily Mail |
18.2% |
| You Magazine |
14.4% |
| The Mirror |
10.2% |
| Saga Magazine |
9.6% |
| Daily Telegraph |
7.3% |
| Hello Magazine |
6.3% |
These media are more likely to be read by an older, more risk-averse
group. At the other end of the scale, youth media such as Mizz, Playstation
Magazine and Bliss are of little interest to a client
who markets through financial advisers, with less than one percent
of the key audience being reached by them.
So now I know where I should be placing coverage, how do
I evaluate how effective my campaign has been?
A
key difference between PR and advertising is that an ad’s
placement and content is guaranteed and, therefore, the
return on investment needs to be tracked in the form
of audience outtake. PR, on the other hand, is an exercise in
achieving appropriate media placement and favorable content, and
so we need to establish whether key audiences have had the opportunity
to be exposed to a particular campaign.
In our partnerships with TGI and Mindshare ATG, we have successfully
adapted the planning tools used by the advertisers to fulfill this
post-program evaluation role. The following example highlights the
application of this process in assessing Volvo's launch of its XC90
SUV.
In the case of the Volvo XC90, there was significant emphasis placed
on PR at the launch. PR traditionally plays a large part in the buying
decision for a car, but how do you reach out to exactly the right
group of people? In this instance, the market insight department
had identified this target as Adults 25-44, higher income band,
higher education level, with a keen sense of adventure. And,
even more difficult, how do you ascertain whether you have reached
them or not?
Adults 25-44, higher income band, higher education
level, with a keen sense of adventure
Mindshare ATG calculated the size of this target audience at 609,000
people in the U.K.
Volvo put together an excellent campaign aimed
at the consumer, lifestyle and news media, selected specifically
for their ranking against the key audience. These were targeted
in addition to the traditional media for a vehicle launch – the
specialist automotive pages.
The campaign produced a large quantity of press clippings, but
to complete the process, the actual penetration of the campaign within
the identified key audience was evaluated. Results were calculated
based on the reach and frequency of the
coverage. Reach means the percentage of
the target audience reached and frequency denotes
the average number of times audience members have been exposed to
the information. These are terms used in ad media buying to determine
the efficiency of an ad campaign buying schedule before the
media time is purchased. The difference here is that this tool is
used as a post-campaign evaluation of PR.
The XC90 launch was highly successful in terms of the reach and
frequency achieved, with 96.7% of all people within the target audience
being reached by the campaign at least once. When compared against
the control sample of all U.K. adults, the result within the target
group was significantly better: 85% of all U.K. adults were reached
at least once.
Another aspect of this analysis is that the reinforcement of the
PR message can also be measured in terms of the frequency of hits
within the target audience. Whereas 47.5% of all U.K. adults were
reached seven or more times, 65.6% of people within the target audience
were hit on at least seven occasions by the campaign.
Therefore, we found that this campaign was more effective at reaching
the core audience than the population at large, in terms of both
reach and of frequency.

[ Click to Enlarge ]

[ Click to Enlarge ]
So, we targeted the right media and attained coverage. But did
it work?
In the case of the XC90, the successful
targeting of the campaign yielded excellent results,
both in terms of consumer awareness and sales.
The findings from the brand awareness tracking were that almost
twice as many people claimed to be very familiar with the XC90 than
either of its two key rivals. This was a major coup, as the brand
was so new. The largest increase in familiarity during the analyzed
period was directly attributable to its highest peak in PR.
Orders for the XC90 were found to correlate closely with bursts
of PR activity. The small amount of advertising undertaken was effective
in creating a minor uplift in the number of enquiries, but the campaign
was so successful that Volvo was selling higher numbers of cars than
anticipated and building up a waiting list. The decision was therefore
taken to cancel further advertising, saving significant budget, which
could then be diverted to support other models.
I don’t have the budget to do all
that research. How can I compare the output from PR with other
media?
The
investment in buying reach and frequency information is minimal
in comparison with commissioning a full-market or sales research
study. You can, however, calculate a return on investment
figure in comparison with advertising and other media.
In the example below, it can be seen that, although
it is difficult to beat TV advertising’s cut through to consumers,
the delivery of this audience is relatively expensive. Radio advertising
and PR appear to be relatively inexpensive ways of delivering audience
reach.
Type
of exposure |
Reach |
Cost
per thousand
reached $ |
|
| PR |
82% |
$0.70 |
| Radio advertising |
13% |
$1.01 |
| Outdoor advertising |
56% |
$2.46 |
| Press advertising |
63% |
$3.08 |
| TV advertising |
98% |
$4.45 |
But the currency of PR is time, not money. How do I evaluate
return on investment on time spent?
If you can estimate
roughly how much time the PR team spent on gaining coverage in each
medium, they can gain an understanding of the efficiency of their
use of time on that campaign.
| Media category |
Time spent |
Reach |
|
| National press |
20% |
42.9% |
| Regional press |
30% |
29.3% |
| Consumer press |
5% |
23.1% |
| Radio |
20% |
6.8% |
| TV |
15% |
2.3% |
On this FMCG - Fast Moving Consumer Goods - campaign,
the amount of time spent trying to gain coverage in the
broadcast media did not pay off. National press achieved
very good coverage, but in terms of the time spent on
gaining coverage, the relative return on investment was
extremely good within the consumer press.
Thus, this can be a learning for the next campaign – to concentrate more on targeted lifestyle features and spend less time chasing TV coverage, which appears to represent too much pain for too little gain, at least in this category.
The silver bullet?
None of this smart media and time planning will
ever be a substitute for good creative materials and
excellent media relations, just as the best ad media planner in the
world cannot help an ad with hopeless creative content. Nor is PR
going to be a substitute for TV advertising when a brand needs certain
types of support, such as mass awareness or image support. It is
important, however, that the efficiency of these different marketing
communication methods can be measured fairly. With TGI and Precis,
you can now plan and evaluate a campaign in a way that is credible
and comprehensible to the rest of the marketing community, allowing
PR to sit “at the big table” with the marketing folk.
|